Pro-democracy lawmakers celebrate outside the Legislative Council in Hong Kong
Hong Kong lawmakers defeated the government’s Beijing-backed election plan yesterday, vindicating pro-democracy activists who flooded the streets last year in protest but leaving the city’s long-term political future up in the air.
Lawmakers spent two days debating the proposal, which would have allowed Hong Kong citizens to vote for the top leader for the first time in 2017, but require that all candidates be approved by Beijing.
But the crucial legislature vote ended in a confusing anticlimax when most pro-establishment lawmakers walked out moments before it began. The proposal was rejected after 28 lawmakers, all but one from pro-democracy parties, voted against it. Eight others were in favor and 34 did not cast votes.
Even if the lawmakers had remained, the proposal would have been rejected because the government needed at least 47 of 70 votes for approval.
Outside the legislature, pro-democracy supporters cheered after hearing the result.
“This is the result that we want, so everyone is very happy,” said 19-year-old student Sylvia Leung.
The defeat marks the end of the territory’s most tumultuous year since Beijing took control in 1997. Known for being a stable and prosperous Asian financial center, Hong Kong has been hit by chaotic and unruly protests since Beijing decreed last summer that it wanted elections to be restricted. Tens of thousands of people, most of them students, took to the streets in response, occupying busy thoroughfares in three neighborhoods for 11 weeks last autumn to protest what they called “fake democracy.”
The defeat raises the prospect of a political stalemate for years to come.
Hong Kong Chief Secretary Carrie Lam told lawmakers just before the vote that she was “sad and disappointed” knowing that the proposal would be defeated.
“I don’t know when democratization can be taken forward,” she said. Hong Kong and Beijing officials have said that in the event of a defeat, leaders would continue to be handpicked by a 1,200-member panel of local elites.
Hong Kong retains its own legal and financial system and civil liberties such as freedom of speech not seen on the mainland. Even during colonial times, residents were unable to choose their leader, then known as the governor, who was dispatched from London.
Hong Kong’s unpopular current leader, Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying, said he was “disappointed” with the defeat and signaled that the government would not attempt to restart democratic development during the two years remaining in his term.
“It’s time for the community to move on,” Leung told reporters. “In the coming two years, the Hong Kong government will focus efforts on the various economic development and livelihood issues.”
Pro-democracy leaders vowed to continue fighting for genuine democracy.
“We do not want our votes to be used to legitimize a pre-vetting system,” said Alan Leong, leader of the Civic Party. “We do not want our votes to be used to legitimize a chief executive that belongs and is accountable to only the vested interests.”
“Today is not the end of the democracy movement,” he added. “Quite the contrary, this is the starting point of another wave of democratic movement.”
“They’re trying to pass something that’s fake as genuine,” said Ming Shum, 48, who was part of a crowd protesting against the bill outside the Legislative Council. “We won’t take it.”
Chinese state media blamed radical pro-democracy lawmakers.
“This is a saddening moment in Hong Kong’s path toward democracy,” the nationalist tabloid Global Times opined. “One person, one vote becomes a phantom with the opposition of the pro-democracy legislators. All who cast the no vote might feel smug today but they eventually must face up to their historical duties. History will not judge what they did today to be glorious.”
After two days of heated discussion, the debate came to a bizarre end when most of the pro-establishment lawmakers walked out of the legislature chamber moments before the vote. It was not clear whether it was an attempt to delay the vote, perhaps by depriving it of quorum.
Lawmaker Jeffrey Lam blamed a “communication gap,” explaining that they were waiting for a fellow lawmaker who was ill to return to the chamber. They left even after their request for a 15-minute break was rejected by the legislature president. Kelvin Chan, Hong Kong , AP/Bloomberg
beijing voices regret over hk electoral plan defeat
China yesterday expressed regret over the defeat of Hong Kong’s controversial Beijing-backed electoral plans, saying the result of the vote was something it was “unwilling to see.” However, Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang reiterated Beijing’s support for the proposals, saying it remained the best hope for the semi-autonomous Chinese territory’s continued prosperity. “That the chief executive of the Special Administrative Region’s government should not be elected as such in 2017 is a result we are unwilling to see,” Lu told reporters at a regularly scheduled news briefing yesterday. Since Hong Kong was a part of China, the reforms were a domestic matter with no other countries permitted to intervene, Lu said.
npc says decision on universal suffrage to stand
China’s top legislature said its decision on Hong Kong’s electoral reforms last August will remain in force in the future, despite Hong Kong Legislative Council’s veto of the universal suffrage motion yesterday. “Although the universal suffrage motion was not passed at the Legislative Council, the direction towards universal suffrage and the legal principles laid down in the decision of the National People’s Congress (NPC) Standing Committee, must continue to be upheld in future efforts to pursue universal suffrage,” read a statement from the office of the NPC Standing Committee. “The decision shall continue to serve as the constitutional ground for Hong Kong in the future as it enforces universal suffrage in the chief executive election, and its legal force is unquestionable,” it read.
No Comments