Banking | Panic roils peer-to-peer lenders

China’s savers are rushing to pull money from peer-to-peer lending platforms, accelerating a contraction of the USD195 billion industry and testing the government’s ability to maintain calm as it cracks down on risky shadow-banking activities.

In some cases, savers are turning up at the offices of P2P operators to demand repayment, spooked by reports of defaults, sudden closures and frozen funds. At least 57 platforms have failed in the past two weeks, adding to 80 cases in June, the biggest monthly tally in two years, according to Shanghai-based Yingcan Group. The researcher defines failed platforms as those that have halted operations, come under police investigation, missed investor payments, moved into other businesses, or had operators flee with client money.

“Investors have lost confidence in the smaller platforms, because they have no idea if those companies will survive,” said Dexter Hsu, a Taipei-based analyst at Macquarie Capital. Only a handful of the 2,000 or so remaining firms are likely to endure, he said.

China’s P2P industry, the world’s largest, is one of the riskiest and least-
regulated slices of the nation’s sprawling shadow- banking system. A government clampdown has weighed on P2P platforms for two years, but the pressure intensified in recent months after China’s credit markets tightened and the banking regulator issued an unusual warning to savers that they should be prepared to lose all their money in high-yield products.

The shakeout has cast doubt on the listing plans of several P2P lenders and underscores the delicate balancing act faced by China’s government as it tries to reduce moral hazard in the financial system without triggering a crisis. While there’s little sign that the P2P turmoil has spread to systemically important wealth-management products issued by banks, much of China’s $10 trillion shadow-lending system faces the same headwinds of rising defaults, slowing economic growth and official calls to end to implicit guarantees on risky investments.

The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission didn’t respond to a faxed request for comment.

China’s P2P platforms have about 50 million registered users and 1.3 trillion yuan ($195 billion) of outstanding loans, most of which have short maturities. Normally, savers have to wait for loans facilitated by the platforms to mature before getting their money back. But some are now trying to exit early by selling their rights to others at a discount, or by going to the platform’s offices to demand repayment.

When P2P lender Qian88.com shut last week, it cited “spreading panic among investors” as one of the reasons. Local police were called in to ensure order as customers rushed to the company’s Shenzhen office to demand their money. Another platform, Lqgapp.com, suspended operations last week after some investors talked about difficulties securing repayment in online chatrooms, triggering a flood of withdrawal requests. The platform said it will “attempt” to repay its users over the coming three years. About 220,000 investors are owed about 5 billion yuan.

David Gao, 30, who works in the financial industry in Beijing, invested 1 million yuan of of his savings in P2P loans facilitated by a Hangzhou-based platform in November and has been unable to retrieve his principal and interest. After traveling 700 miles to the company’s office with other investors last week, he found it deserted.

“I won’t invest in P2P platforms any more, I no longer trust them,” said Gao, who had been putting money into online loans for about four years. “I have to move on no matter how upset I am, but a lot of the other investors are old and are suffering more.”

The turmoil is also hurting companies and individuals who have relied on P2P platforms for financing. They include cash-strapped small businesses seeking working capital, individuals without a credit history, and, more recently, leveraged stock market investors and home buyers in need of down-payments.

Some P2P platforms were also raising funds illegally for their own use, while others were running Ponzi schemes that collapsed when the flow of new money halted, regulators have said. That helps explain why authorities have so far been steadfast in cracking down. Bloomberg