FDI

Companies want ‘clarity’ after security rule changes, raids on consultants: Business group

Julian MacCormac, chair of the British Chamber of Commerce in China, speaks to the press at a hotel in Beijing

Foreign companies in China are uncertain about what they are allowed to do following police raids on consulting firms and want “greater clarity” about how newly expanded national security and other rules will be enforced, a foreign business group said yesterday.

The British Chamber of Commerce in China said a survey of its members found they are more optimistic following December’s lifting of anti-virus controls that blocked most travel into and out of China. It said they want to invest but are waiting for steps to “restore the trust and certainty” in China amid tension with Europe and Washington and official plans to promote economic self-reliance.

“If there is greater clarity and greater certainty, then we believe that companies will commit more to China,” said the chamber chairman, Julian MacCormac, at a news conference. Some 70% of companies “are really waiting to see” how conditions develop before taking action.

The Chinese government says foreign companies are welcome and is trying to encourage them to invest more. But they are uneasy following the expansion of national security and other rules with little explanation and official plans to create competitors to global suppliers of processor chips and other technology, sometimes using subsidies and market barriers that have strained relations with the European Union, Washington and other trading partners.

Earlier this week, the government banned use of products from the biggest U.S. maker of memory chips, Micron Technology Inc., in computers that handle sensitive information. It said Micron had unspecified security flaws but gave no explanation.

Companies are on edge after police raided offices of two consultancies, Bain & Co. and Capvision, and a due diligence firm, Mintz Group. Authorities have given no explanation. They say companies are obliged to obey the law but have given no indication of possible violations.

The British chamber represents some 650 companies, many of them in finance, consulting and other service industries that might be affected by tighter curbs on what information can be gathered in China and how it can be used and stored.

Yesterday’s report included 171 suggestions for Chinese regulators including “greater clarity” about data restrictions on the auto industry and addressing what it said is unfair treatment of foreign companies in government purchasing.

The chamber’s director of government relations, Sally Xu, said member companies that responded to a request for questions ahead of a meeting next week with a Ministry of Commerce official all asked about the investigations of consultants.

“Our companies are concerned about this,” Xu said. “They wonder, where is the line between what we can do and cannot do?”

A survey in April found 76% of companies that responded are more optimistic following the end of anti-virus controls that blocked most travel into and out of China, according to the chamber. But its report said the outlook is clouded by an unpredictable business environment, political tension and “increased talk of self-sufficiency.”

“This language around security and self-reliance needs to be balanced against the message of ‘welcome to come to China,’ because I think there is some nervousness,” McCormac said. “It raises uncertainty about, what’s the future like for me as a company in China?

JOE McDONALD, BEIJING, MDT/AP

Categories China Headlines