Sri Lanka | UN rights chief seeks int’l role in war probe

UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Raad al-Hussein of Jordan speaks during the opening of the 30th session of the Human Rights Council at the European headquarters of the United Nations in Geneva

The U.N.’s top human rights official is urging the creation of a special court to look into atrocities committed during Sri Lanka’s long civil war, which left tens of thousands dead.
Zeid Raad al-Hussein pointed to horrific abuses during the conflict, including torture, executions, and sexual abuse by security forces, as well as suicide attacks, assassinations and recruitment of child soldiers by rebels. In a 270-page report focusing on the period from 2002 to 2011, he called yesterday for a “special hybrid court” that would include foreign judges and investigators.
The report comes as the United States is expected to present a resolution at the U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva that aims to improve accountability in Sri Lanka. Rights groups and some governments have urged that an international investigation be undertaken, but Sri Lanka has resisted, saying it would handle the topic domestically.
Zeid hoped the U.N. report will help pave the way for “a most intense reckoning with the past,” insisting that Sri Lanka “will never escape the stinging tentacles of its past” until victims receive some redress. However, he cautioned that details remain to be worked out, such as the extent of the international role in the hybrid court. He said Sri Lanka’s own courts are not yet ready to carry out a fair judicial process.
“It has to be a court that meets the expectations of victims and the international community alike,” he said.
Sri Lanka’s quarter-century civil war ended in 2009 when government forces defeated Tamil Tiger rebels, who had been fighting to create a separate state for ethnic minority Tamils. At least 80,000 people were killed, and possibly many more, including up to 40,000 civilians in the last month of the war, according to U.N. estimates.
Zeid said yesterday’s report had not determined that genocide had taken place, but didn’t rule out that possibility. He said the report was based on a human rights investigation, not a criminal probe. The report’s authors had access to witnesses outside the country, but were not able to question witnesses, victims or alleged perpetrators in Sri Lanka.
Still, the report’s release has been highly anticipated in Sri Lanka and is expected to contribute the national and international debate about the best ways to seek accountability for the atrocities there.
As the rights council opened a three-week session Monday, Sri Lankan Foreign Minister Mangala Samaraweera announced the launch of a truth and reconciliation commission modeled partly on one in post-­apartheid South Africa. Jamey Keaten, Geneva, AP