Court upholds minimum sentences for breaching security law
In this image made from a video, a police van which is believed to be carrying Lui Sai-yu, a jailed university student, arrives at Hong Kong’s Final Court of Appeal, yesterday
A jailed university student who pleaded guilty to inciting secession in Hong Kong lost his bid to reduce his five-year sentence in a court ruling yesterday that is expected to set the bar for other cases brought under the national security law.
Lui Sai-yu pleaded guilty in April 2022 and admitted that content on a Telegram channel he administered incited others to separate Hong Kong from China or alter the legal status of the city unlawfully.
But his timely guilty plea did not get him a one-third reduction in the length of his imprisonment — like in many other cases under Hong Kong’s common law system — because the security law imposed minimum jail terms for serious offenses.
Lui is one of the some 260 people who were arrested under the security law as Beijing tried to crush dissidents following the massive protests in 2019. The top court’s ruling on his appeal may guide sentencings in other national security cases, including for the city’s most prominent democracy leaders who also pleaded guilty.
The judges unanimously dismissed Lui’s appeal and ruled that the minimum penalty of five years is mandatory for those committing serious offenses in relation to secession as stipulated by the security law.
They said in a written judgment that the appellant had sought to argue the three conditions capable of triggering the mitigating benefits in Article 33 of the security law were not exhaustive.
One condition under that article is that offenders voluntarily stopped committing the offense or voluntarily and effectively forestalled its consequence during the process. The other two conditions are that offenders surrender themselves and give a truthful account of the crime; and that offenders report on offenses committed by other persons with their accounts verified to be true or providing material information that assists in solving other case.
The judges ruled the three conditions specified in Article 33 are exhaustive and the article does not accommodate guilty pleas.
In sentencing him last year, a judge at a lower court originally planned to jail Lui for 44 months after giving him a one-third sentence reduction due to his guilty plea. But she amended the sentence after the prosecution argued the crime Lui committed was of serious nature and therefore the minimum penalty should be five years.
Lui appealed the decision but lost.
Lui was not a prominent pro-democracy activist. He was the fourth person jailed under the sweeping security law. He was studying civil engineering when he was first arrested in September 2020.
According to a previous judgment, his Telegram channel carried messages containing slogans often chanted by protesters in the 2019 movement that roiled the city for months.
The protests waned with the arrests and exiles of democracy activists, the COVID-19 pandemic and the security law.
Observers expect yesterday’s judgment to guide other cases, including the future sentencing for 31 of the 47 activists who pleaded guilty to the subversion charges for their alleged involvement in an unofficial primary election in 2020. Those activists included former student leader Joshua Wong.
Critics say the freedoms promised when Hong Kong returned to Chinese rule in 1997 have greatly declined after the enactment of the law. But the Hong Kong government praised it for restoring stability. KANIS LEUNG, HONG KONG, MDT/AP
