The government announced it would collect public opinions and conduct an integrated analysis on the construction method for the access roads of the overpass that will connect Zones A and B, or the new landfills.
The topic has never been settled but has now gained widespread attention, mainly following an extensive report led by the Association of Synergy of Macao.
The report heavily criticized the government’s decision to build the overpass, raising new concerns about the destruction of several facilities, including the viewpoint and passage that link the Macao Cultural Center to the coastal promenade.
In a joint statement issued by the Public Works Bureau, the Land and Urban Construction Bureau, and the Cultural Affairs Bureau, the government noted that the decision to construct the overpass was made long ago after careful consideration. The project was awarded through a public tender that covered both design and execution.
The government also stated that the contract for the project was awarded in October of last year, and the design is currently underway. However, it emphasized that it remains open-minded and is willing to consider public feedback in order to optimize the project if necessary.
Since the beginning of this year, the association that elected lawmaker Ron Lam to the current Legislative Assembly has issued several opinions and reports. These documents have questioned not only the design of the overpass but also the decision to build this type of structure instead of an underwater tunnel.
Recently, the association has shifted its focus to the potential consequences of the construction on the coastal park and leisure area around the Kun Iam Statue. Concerns include the removal of trees and the destruction of several public-use facilities.
The association also argues that the overpass will disrupt the peaceful nature of the area, which is one of the few places where residents can relax.
The association’s positions have been voiced by Johnson Ian, former editor of the Macao Daily News and a potential candidate for a seat in the Legislative Assembly in this year’s elections.
Several other organizations and groups have criticized the decision to build the overpass, arguing that it will obstruct views from the coastal area and pose problems for maritime navigation, as it will be constructed above the navigation channel leading to the Outer Harbour Ferry Terminal.
No Comments